Five source records, four conditional receipts
Published measures stay distinct. The model stays a model.
The source preserves each paper's actual OR, RR, or HR and endpoint, then separately defines five bounded scenario coefficients and editorial weights. Lean checks range, formal cons monotonicity, pairwise definition equivalence, and permutation invariance—not causality, intervention safety, clinical comparability, or a personal outcome.
5
scenario inputs
4
named receipts
OR / RR / HR
evidence measures
Holt-Lunstad 2010 — survival OR 1.50 (95% CI 1.42–1.59)Arem 2015 — all-cause HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.67–0.70) at 7.5 to <15 MET-h/weekCorrected PREDIMED — primary CVD HR 0.69/0.72; all-cause HR 0.90 (0.69–1.18) / 1.12 (0.86–1.47)Cohen 2016 — adjusted pooled all-cause RR 0.83 (95% CI 0.75–0.91)Momma 2022 — RR 0.85 (0.79–0.93) any-vs-none; RR 0.83 (0.79–0.86) near 40 min/week; very-low certainty
Evidence records
Each receipt is conditional on the formal scenario-input contract. None proves empirical causality, clinical comparability, intervention safety, or a personal health outcome.